Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment; What has Changed in the Last 30 Years.
PDF
Cite
Share
Request
Original Article
P: 115-127
2021

Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment; What has Changed in the Last 30 Years.

Acta Haematol Oncol Turc 2021;54(1):115-127
1. Medipol Mega University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
2.
No information available.
No information available
Received Date: 2020-11-11T22:11:56
Accepted Date: 2021-04-07T09:26:09
PDF
Cite
Share
Request

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In this study, based on the Hodgkin lymphoma thesis made in 1990, current developments in Hodgkin lymphoma diagnosis, imaging and treatment are examined with case samples. Changes in treatment indication in the last 30 years, shrinkage in radiotherapy treatment areas and radiotherapy dose reductions are evaluated comparatively, taking into account historical processes.

METHODS

The demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients whose treatment was completed in the radiotherapy clinic of Ankara Numune Hospital between 1985-1990 will be summarized and the current imaging methods and treatment approaches at that time are compared with current approaches.

RESULTS

The data of 60 cases treated with the diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma in Ankara Numune Hospital between 1985-1990 are analyzed. The median age was 31. Histologic types and stages are distributed evenly between the groups. The initial involvement areas are such that; 34 cases start in the cervical-supraclavicular region (56%), eight in inguinofemoral (13%), seven in axillary (11%), five in mediastinal (8.2), three in the abdominal (5.3%), two in the tonsillar (3%), one in primary cerebral. Diseases that initiated under the diaphragm were 18% of the total. Mixcellular type constituted the most common group. In the 1980s, the standard treatment method for Stage IA and II A Hodgkin lymphoma was Sub Total Lymphoid Irradiation (Mantle, Inverted Y). In this period, the most advanced technique used in Hodgkin lymphoma imaging was Bi-Pedal Lymphangygraphy, while FDG PET-CT is the primary imaging method today. In this study, the number of recurrent patients is to be found 6 out of 58 who received radiotherapy. Four of them were outside the field, and two were within.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The excessive number of out of field recurrences, side effects such as growth and development retardation, cardiac problems, and increase in secondary cancers caused (especially in the childhood age group) by wide-field radiotherapy applications; led researchers to seek new treatment modalities. Nowadays, applications of radiotherapy with reduced size and decreased dose combined with better chemotherapy practices. While improvements in both chemotherapy and radiotherapy techniques have increased the 5-year life above 90%, morbid side effects have remained anecdotal in historical articles.